Some grouse that this removes the experience issue from McCain's quiver and that may in fact be true -- although this comparison by Red State of the Governor's record next to Obama's is somewhat devastating to the Senator.
But here is the key; In 2008 change trumps experience hands down.
The adds practically write themselves:
Open with the Hillary statement of McCain being qualified on day one and "Obama has a speech he gave in 2002"
Voice over -- that hot lady's voice (that hasn't been Palin all along has it?)
"One team has a record of "-- fill in the issues, or "One Candidate picked a VP from outside The Washington system and she has a record of,"
Hillary's Voice over in the background slightly echo/muted --
- "Confronting and defeating corrupt political machines regardless of party affiliation." -- Show some of the many headlines of Governor Palin addressing the corruption in her own party in Alaska and McCain addressing spending and corruption in Washington (Republicans spending like drunken sailers anyone)
"And Senator Obama has a speech he gave in 2002" while showing headlines of his ties to Rezko and the corrupt Chicago Machine and his admission to the boneheaded move that he profited from, and his picking Biden who has been in the Senate since Palin was 9.
End with the, "don't hope for change, vote for it!" line or an even stronger line about one team with a proven track record of change.
Pick an issue -- you want change, one team has a record of accomplishing real meaningful change. Hit the Maverick line hard, after all the press gave him the label, rub their noses in it!
Do an entire series hitting hard on energy policy, foreign policy, and the economy, but throw in education, Obama's death of aborted babies argument, you name it they can dig it up.
Gee' didn't Bill Clinton just propose this in his candidate X candidate Y scenario last week:
Suppose, for example, you’re a voter, and you have candidate X and you have candidate Y. Candidate X agrees with you on everything but you don’t think that person can deliver on anything. Candidate Y disagrees with you on half the issues, but you believe that, on the other half, the candidate will be able to deliver.
This is the kind of question that I predict - and this has nothing to do with what’s going on now - but I am just saying if you look at five, 10, 15 years from now, you may actually see this delivery issue become a serious issue in Democratic debates because it is so hard to figure out how to turn good intentions into real changes in the lives of the people we represent.
This type of attack would again put Obama on the defense and reduce the impact of the McCain/Bush talking point that Obama camp has been pushing so very hard.
As a matter of fact, here is another really good one that would put a huge dent in that meme:
Open with the Hillary statement of McCain being qualified on day one and "Obama has a speech he gave in 2002"
Voice over -- that hot lady's voice,
"One team has a proven record of fighting for the surge that was necessary for victory in Iraq," -- clippings or video of McCain's repeated calls for a surge.DKK
Hillary's Voice over in the background slightly echo/muted --
"And Senator Obama has a speech he gave in 2002" then show the interview of Obama saying his policies in Iraq were not much different then the Bush administration!
"Don't hope for change, vote for it -- McCain/Palin!"
Update --
Last Sunday, 24 hours after Mr. Obama announced his running mate, Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr. of Delaware, Mr. McCain met with his senior campaign team at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel in Phoenix. By then, campaign advisers said, the group had long decided that Mr. McCain’s “experience versus change” argument against Mr. Obama had run its course, to the extent that it had worked at all…NYTimes via Hot Air
In any case, one campaign adviser said, Mr. McCain hated running as the wizened old hand of experience. Despite his embrace this year of President Bush and many of the administration’s policies, Mr. McCain, a campaign adviser said, still saw himself as the maverick who delighted in occasionally throwing political grenades at his own Party.
DKK